The winner are the 4 that win the final. Having it completely random throughout means the higher skilled players will have to adapt to play with lower skilled players. I mean technically with a bit of luck it means a lower skilled player stands more of a chance of progressing far
random teams is fine but random civis is just 70/30 luck/skills.
I had a similar idea a while back but with more skilled players. I was planning on doing a $500 tournament but after a while I realized the type of assholes many of these players are and how much they don't deserve my money
Ok, I agree that a month is a bit too long. Try 1 week or 2. I do think we should keep the same teams to allow more competitiveness. I think if a format of this sort is too be used the bulk of the responsibility has to land on the experienced players. They need to schedule games + lead and teach the team. So the big question is are there enough good players that would commit and promote this.
Also, this should be about fun and not winning. The goal is to initiate or give the spark for new players to become a Cs regular.
And jv you arent qualified to lead anything with your level of maturity so gtfo if u dont have anything constructive to add.
Random civ should be good, with a Challenge option.
If a team A thinks they are outciv they can ask a challenge
Meaning the other team B will either:
-Accept it and switch civ to prove they can win it if the team B wins the match they get 2 points
-Decline it and restart with an another set of civ
Random civ should be good, with a Challenge option.
If a team A thinks they are outciv they can ask a challenge
Meaning the other team B will either:
-Accept it and switch civ to prove they can win it if the team B wins the match they get 2 points
-Decline it and restart with an another set of civ
Random civ should be good, with a Challenge option.
If a team A thinks they are outciv they can ask a challenge
Meaning the other team B will either:
-Accept it and switch civ to prove they can win it if the team B wins the match they get 2 points
-Decline it and restart with an another set of civ
teams will keep challenging 11. It could be a league but i dont see any tourney like this.
Should of happenned
Also, this should be about fun and not winning. The goal is to initiate or give the spark for new players to become a Cs regular.
And jv you arent qualified to lead anything with your level of maturity so gtfo if u dont have anything constructive to add.
If a team A thinks they are outciv they can ask a challenge
Meaning the other team B will either:
-Accept it and switch civ to prove they can win it if the team B wins the match they get 2 points
-Decline it and restart with an another set of civ
You should start your spanish lessons in [You must login to view link] and read what the heck did I write.
If a team A thinks they are outciv they can ask a challenge
Meaning the other team B will either:
-Accept it and switch civ to prove they can win it if the team B wins the match they get 2 points
-Decline it and restart with an another set of civ
If a team A thinks they are outciv they can ask a challenge
Meaning the other team B will either:
-Accept it and switch civ to prove they can win it if the team B wins the match they get 2 points
-Decline it and restart with an another set of civ
"What the heck did did I write"
Lol that English just turned me into an English major (sarcasm incase you don't understand).
Lol that English just turned me into an English major (sarcasm incase you don't understand).
i no english speak i are sorry
Edit *** England would win m8s, me, rick and trident
Edit *** England would win m8s, me, rick and trident
rix and trident will carry u